|
|
|
COMMON PURPOSE CRIMINALS 
According to this, Common Purpose is "a criminal organisation that abuses government posts for gain".
"Incitement to criminality: In reality operating outside authority for the police, and many others, means operating illegally and without accountability. This does not bother Middleton however, who urges Common Purpose leaders to create their own legitimacy. She quotes organisations as Stranger 1 and Stranger 2. But why are these strangers so shy? Are they financial contributors, do they have political agendas? If readers sense something sinister at work, I agree. Middleton does not really explain how, when she took over, she was able to raise £500,000 in a few months, and continues to receive huge donations from big business. She does not tell the reader how her Advisory Boards in each City select members for the Common Purpose élite. We know about half are selected for the inner sanctum - those who can be compromised, those who can be bribed with big salaries in quango or non jobs ,and those who will lie to conceal CP activities. But she does give a hint as to how the chosen are classified - 'Suns' (people of established power and influence), as 'Stars' (those of rapid but unpredictable rise to power and influence), and as 'Moons' (those individuals of diminishing power). Those who will not help Common Purpose, or who challenge it, are called 'Black Holes'." Brian Gerrish Tax evasion Common Purpose uses public sector facilities and office space for which it has made no payment nor signed any formal agreements. Is this to evade tax? Breaches of Data Protection law 2009-01-20 "Common Purpose has been reported to the Information Commissioner's Office for alleged breaches of data protection law." Read more here. Ultra Vires  A Common Purpose quote: "People who lead beyond their authority can produce change beyond their direct circle of control". Leading beyond authority can mean acting ultra vires. Ultra vires a legal concept. It is Latin for 'beyond the powers'. It can apply to any body which has rules, such as a charity or a local authority. An ultra vires act is one that is outside the specified and/or implied constitutional objects and powers of the body in question. It is "beyond the powers" and therefore illegal. Also, what are the implications of 'leading beyond authority' for services which require a hierchical management structure to ensure discipline and cohesion, like the armed forces and police which can be manipulated from within for political purposes? How can CP get around this? By getting the New Labour 'government' to change the laws, of course. Common Purpose 'Charity' Common Purpose operates fraudulently as a charity. 1. Common Purpose has redefined the meaning of 'charity'. Although Common Purpose calls itself an 'educational charity', it is not the poor and disadvantaged who benefit. Instead, the main beneficiaries are the rich and powerful. 2. According to the Charity Commission, "An organisation will not be charitable if its purposes are political." When you get beneath the facade of Common Purpose, its purposes are clearly political, not educational. The hidden agenda of Common Purpose is based on the political philosophy of the 'Third Way' and pursues the political objective of the creation of a collectivist and corporatist society within the European Union. Why is Common Purpose allowed to be a charity when its hidden agenda is clearly political? If you have any evidence of political activity by Common Purpose, please contact me. Local authority fiddles Common Purpose has been obtaining money for training unlawfully, on at least three counts: - the decision for local authorities to spend the money on training was taken outside of the democratic processes and is therefore unlawful - the local authorities, when pressed, had to admit that there was no financial benefit to the ratepayer, i.e. unlawful - there are large bills for creating bespoke training courses, when in fact it is the same off-the-shelf course, i.e. fraud Curiously enough, Wikipedia defines 'common purpose' as: "In criminal law, the doctrine of common purpose, common design or joint enterprise refers to the situation where two or more people embark on a project with a common purpose that results in the commission of a crime. In this situation the participants are jointly liable for all that results from the acts and omissions occurring within the scope of their agreement." Well, fancy that! |
|
|
Please consider a donation towards the costs of this campaign. |